The Nobel season and some musings on science and women

This is the Nobel season – come the first week of October, there would be those who know they are on the nominated list, who will be anxiously keeping an ear open for the famous ring!!! There are the prizes for Peace,  Literature and Economics, all of which have had some element of political fine balancing, and the choices have  often led to much public debate. However, the  Science prizes  – Medicine or Physiology, Physics, Chemistry – have evoked less controversy and without question, these are the highest recognition of scientific excellence.

The average age of the Science Nobel recipients, being awarded since 1901,  is in the 50s,(55 for Physics and 58 for Chemistry and Medicine) and women have generally done poorly (11/105 in Medicine, 4 in /106 in Chemistry and 2/108 in Physics) for many obvious reasons. In the first half of the century , women featured only 4 times in the list – twice Marie Curie (1903 and 1911), her daughter in 1935 and the prize in Medicine in 1947 to Gerty Con. In the second half of the 20th century, 7 women made it to the list, one each in Physics and Chemistry and 4 in Physiology and Medicine. In the 14 awards of this century women have featured once in Chemistry and 6 times in Physiology and Medicine (2 in 2009), the latest being the one to May-Britt Moser this year. And the Fields Medal, the Nobel equivalent in Mathematics which was established in 1935 was won by a woman for the first time this year.

So is it that the other half is dumb or does not like science?  It is clear that over a 100 years, the gender gap in science is not  closing, even marginally.  Of course, the Nobel is not the only  parameter for testing the waters, and there are statistics out there on how few women head Science Departments in Universities, occupy prestigious chairs, etc… In the pre-war and early post-war years, women had not stepped out into the public space and their numbers accessing higher education was still low. But in the years since then, that has changed and in 2010 in the US more women received doctorates than men. But this is not true for the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Medicine) subjects, where there is an inherent bias in women themselves due to gender conditioning, and against women by the male establishment.

The scenario in India is not different and in fact, worse from many aspects. The positive is that there are discussions out there, recognition that there is an issue and some efforts (no where near enough though) towards mitigation. The Department of Science and Technology, Government of India introduced a ‘Women Scientist’ scheme more than a decade ago, to encourage women in science and their re-entry after a lay off. I was a member of this Committee for a few years, and the reasons why women had to leave their jobs were far beyond the ‘child-bearing’ one – husband’s transfer, illness in the family (husband, mother-in-law, father-in-law), opposition from in-laws following marriage etc…. At the time, it was amongst the first such initiative globally. Also, in our structured, non-negotiable pay structure both sexes get the same pay, unlike in the US where because pays are negotiated, women get 70-80% of male pay. Even now, although there are many supportive male colleagues, I do hear occasional mutterings of  the ‘unfair’ advantages women get!!!

I am thinking that it will be a long haul to see women and men have an equal playing field in science, as in so many other fields. And I seriously doubt whether in my life time, seeing a woman on the annual Nobel list will not be a novelty!!!






One thought on “The Nobel season and some musings on science and women

  1. I so agree with you and I am equally surprised about it.

    Last year, or maybe the year before that, a page called IFLS (I fucking love science) came into existence on FB. After the page grew to one lakh likes, the girl behind the page, who was anonymous till then, stepped out to thank people. The page was so cool that this girl was the first one to discover those strange fibers in McDonald’s chicken nuggets, and other everyday useful information from the world of science. But I still remember the day when she told the world that she was the creator of the page. People ALL OVER THE WORLD went berserk with “Oh! you are a girl!”, “You are so beautiful, are you really into science?” “Ohh! you are cute, AND you have brains too!”, I felt despite all the technology and evolution, we somehow, still are in the stone-age era. And this isn’t country-specific. This bias is so deeply embedded that it is a question mark on the school of thought most of the people seem to have.

    By the way, that page I was talking about, has been taken down by FB, and it is a website now. Here is the link to it:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s